Karet or Being “Cut Off” in Torah

The first reference is Genesis 17:14, “Any uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin shall be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant.”

What does it mean to be “cut off” from the people? A technical word for this is extirpation. While we’re throwing around fancy words, another way to talk about being cut off is excision. Excision. Extirpation. Excommunication. What is all this about? What things in Torah bring such a penalty? Is there any hope of forgiveness and release from such a penalty?

Causes of the Karet Penalty
Jacob Milgrom categorizes and lists all the crimes in Torah that result in being cut off. The list is surprising. Offenses range from those which seem relatively minor (eating leaven during Passover week) to major (sacrificing children to Molech).

Here is a simplified breakdown based on Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16, Anchor Bible, 458:

Sacred time. Not sacrificing the Passover (Num 9:13). Eating leaven during Passover (Exod 12:15, 19). Working on the Sabbath (Exod 31:14). Working or failing to fast on Yom Kippur (Lev 23:29, 30).

Sacred substance. Eating/drinking blood (Lev 7:27; 17:10, 14). Eating suet (organ fat, Lev 7:25). Misuse of holy incense (Exod 30:38). Misuse of holy oil (Exod 30:33). Eating sacrificial meat beyond the permitted time (Lev 7:18; 19:8). Eating sacrificial meat while impure (Lev 7:20-21). Levites entering sacred areas (Num 18:3; cf. 4:15, 19-20). Blaspheming or sinning with defiance (Num 15:30-31; cf. Lev 24:15).

Purification rituals. Neglecting circumcision (Gen 17:14). Neglecting purification after corpse contact (Num 19:13-20).

Illicit worship. Molech worship (Lev 20:2-5; Ezek 14:5). Necromancy (Lev 20:6). Slaughter/sacrifice outside the sanctuary (Lev 17:4, 9).

Illicit sex. Incestuous marriages (Lev 18:27-29).

What is Karet?
Theories could include the following:
(1) Death penalty.
(2) Death penalty for offender and his whole family.
(3) A divine decree of death (not actionable by the people) at certain age (some have suggested before the age of sixty or fifty-two).
(4) A divine decree of a premature and childless death.
(5) A divine decree of the ending of the family line (extirpation).
(6) Denial of afterlife (no “gathering to the ancestors”).
(7) Excommunication from the people.

Karet is not simply the death penalty. The death penalty is carried out by witnesses of a crime and the rest of the townspeople. The Molech worship passage in Leviticus 20:2-5 is an example of a person incurring two penalties: the death penalty and karet.

Neither is karet a death penalty for a person’s entire family. That sort of penalty is different. It is called kherem (the ban) and the most famous example is Achan (Joshua 7).

Psalm 109:13 is helpful: “May his posterity be cut off; may his name be blotted out in the second generation!” The phrase “cut off” is from the karet root. Milgrom also cites Ruth 4:10 and the fear that a person’s line of descendants might end up “cut off” through the death of those carrying on the name. Being cut off (karet) can happen naturally through deaths and does not have to be a divine penalty for a crime. Add also Malachi 2:12.

Extirpation, the end of a family line, is the likely meaning of karet. Those who commit crimes worthy of karet will, in a matter of generations, find their line coming to an end.

Yet it also may mean a denial of afterlife. The biblical language of a person being “gathered to his kin” or “ancestors” is arguably more than just a reference to burial (as it is used in some cases of people who were not buried in the family tomb). See Num 20:24; 27:13; 31:2; Gen 15:15; 47:30; Judg 2:10 for some examples of this language in the Bible which probably carries with it notions of afterlife.

As Milgrom points out, karet may very well be both denial of afterlife and a decree from God that a person’s family line will come to an end.

Are Karet Sins Forgivable?
The answer to this should be “obviously.”

There are many examples. One of my favorites is 2 Chronicles 30:17-20. The people have violated one of the stern commands with the penalty of karet. They have eaten the Passover in impurity. They have violated Leviticus 7:20-21 and probably for all of their lives they have violated Numbers 9:13 and Exodus 12:15, 19. Yet here is what we read:

For there were many in the assembly who had not sanctified themselves; therefore the Levites had to kill the passover lamb for every one who was not clean, to make it holy to the Lord. For a multitude of the people, many of them from Ephraim, Manasseh, Issachar, and Zebulun, had not cleansed themselves, yet they ate the passover otherwise than as prescribed. For Hezekiah had prayed for them, saying, “The good Lord pardon every one who sets his heart to seek God, the Lord the God of his fathers, even though not according to the sanctuary’s rules of cleanness.” And the Lord heard Hezekiah, and healed the people.

This entry was posted in Bible, Death, Life to Come, Torah and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Karet or Being “Cut Off” in Torah

  1. benicho says:

    Wow, interesting, I was wondering if being cut off was an unforgivable offense this weekend while reading Lev.

    In Leviticus there are cases where it’s obviously excommunication, was it not possible to be brought back into the fold? Where did they go otherwise?

  2. Derek Leman says:


    I’m dubious that there is a case of excommunication in Leviticus as the likely meaning of karet. Please give me an example.


    • benicho says:

      Sorry, I worded that incorrectly. I meant that there are examples that seemingly mean excommunication, not obviously.

      What do you make about Leviticus 20:3?

      Sacrifice/worship of Molech>Gd sets face against that person>cuts him off from their people. They’re to be put to death, if not, they’re cut off from the people, this seems to breach many more laws, like fornication, defiling the land and Gd’s sanctuary and harlotry, for example.

      I don’t know what excommunication would’ve meant to the Israelites then, I really only understand it from a European context in relation to the church. Was excommunication as we know in the west anything even similar? Doesn’t seem to be..

  3. Derek Leman says:

    I’m glad you brought up Leviticus 20:3. It is the case that proves the point. The person is put to death and also sentenced to karet (being cut off). Thus, karet in this verse cannot mean excommunication (what, he can’t be buried in the cemetery?). It has to mean something like extirpation (his line of descendants will come to an end and his name erased) or denial of afterlife.


  4. benicho says:

    You’re right, your deduction is right. Those are physical karet, what bearing does that have on what comes later (Judgement Day). Aside from blatantly disobeying Gd and sacrificing/worshiping Molech you’ve disobeyed with some sort of intent to gain something you believed Gd could not provide. If we’re all to be judged on our works and intent of our heart, where would that leave someone who worshiped Molech, ya know? Compare to the ones at Sinai who built the golden calf to worship Gd through.

    Karet varies completely from excommunication in historical European Christianity so this is quite interesting.

Comments are closed.